Nome e qualifica del proponente del progetto: 
sb_p_1961346
Anno: 
2020
Abstract: 

Radioresistance of tumor cells constitutes the primary cause of tumor recurrence and relapse. Cancer stem cells (CSC) could be in large part responsible for the inherent radioresistance of a different number of tumors. Particularly relevant is the finding that patient-derived as well as cultured CSCs exhibit a robust DNA Damage Response (DDR) as compared to relatively more differentiated malignant cells. It is believed that enhanced DDR could result from a general adaptation to high levels of DNA replication stress already active in untreated cells and that will cause and increase activation of DDR after irradiation thereby contributing to tumor radioresistance. Promotion of CSCs properties can result also from dysregulation of miRNAs. The mechanisms underlying CSC's refractoriness to radiation remain still poorly understood.
We found that a chronic treatment with a low dose radiation (LDR) determines a radioadaptive response to IR-induced chromosome breaks that renders Drosophila mitotic cells more resistant than untreated cells to DNA damage. Our analyses reveal that the radioadaptive response shares common features with that observed in tumor cells and in CSCs that are resistant to IR. Remarkably some of the genes that are modulated in radioadapted Drosophila cells are also involved in regulation of stemness and encode Drosophila orthologs of human proteins (i.e. the RNA binding protein TARBP2, a member of the RISC complex) with roles in CSC and tumor progression. We will use fruitflies as an animal model for providing new information on the mechanisms of radioresistance and for unveiling conserved factors involved in CSC radioresistance. We believe that these results will be clinically relevant for tumor biology.

ERC: 
LS2_5
LS2_2
LS4_6
Componenti gruppo di ricerca: 
sb_cp_is_2464706
sb_cp_is_2465377
sb_cp_is_2517692
Innovatività: 

Understanding the molecular bases of radioresistance is clinically relevant for tumor biology as it represents a major determinant of the radiotherapy outcome and prognosis in tumor patients. By the identification and characterization in flies of new factors involved in radioresistance we will generate important information to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying radioresistance and unravel an unanticipated role for Loqs/TARBP2 in regulating tumor cells and CSCs survival upon irradiation.

REFERENCES
1 Baumann, M, Krause, M & Hill, R. Exploring the role of cancer stem cells in radioresistance. Nat Rev Cancer 8, 545-554, doi:10.1038/nrc2419 (2008)
2 Abad, E, Graifer, D & Lyakhovich, A. DNA damage response and resistance of cancer stem cells. Cancer Lett 474, 106-117, doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.008 (2020)
3 Bedard, PL et al. Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature 501, 355-364, doi:10.1038/nature12627 (2013)
4 Schulz, A et al. Cancer Stem Cells and Radioresistance: DNA Repair and Beyond. Cancers (Basel) 11, doi:10.3390/cancers11060862 (2019)
5 Cheng, L et al. L1CAM regulates DNA damage checkpoint response of glioblastoma stem cells through NBS1. EMBO J 30, 800-813, doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.10 (2011)
6 Carruthers, RD et al. Replication Stress Drives Constitutive Activation of the DNA Damage Response and Radioresistance in Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells. Cancer Res 78, 5060-5071, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0569 (2018)
7 Diehn, M et al. Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature 458, 780-783, doi:10.1038/nature07733 (2009)
8 Asadzadeh, Z et al. microRNAs in cancer stem cells: Biology, pathways, and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Physiol 234, 10002-10017, doi:10.1002/jcp.27885 (2019)
9 Gonczy, P. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: flies and worms pave the way. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9, 355-366, doi:10.1038/nrm2388 (2008)
10 Singh, S R, Aggarwal, P & Hou, S X Cancer Stem Cells and Stem Cell Tumors in Drosophila. Adv Exp Med Biol 1167, 175-190, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23629-8_10 (2019)
11 Gonzalez, C. Drosophila melanogaster: a model and a tool to investigate malignancy and identify new therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 13, 172-183, doi:10.1038/nrc3461 (2013)
12 Li, S., Wang, H & Groth, C. Drosophila neuroblasts as a new model for the study of stem cell self-renewal and tumour formation. Biosci Rep 34, doi:10.1042/BSR20140008 (2014)
13 Park, JK et al. The miRNA pathway intrinsically controls self-renewal of Drosophila germline stem cells. Curr Biol 17, 533-538, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.060 (2007)
14 Forstemann, K et al. Normal microRNA maturation and germ-line stem cell maintenance requires Loquacious, a double-stranded RNA-binding domain protein. PLoS Biol 3, e236, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030236 (2005)
15 Bao, S et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444, 756-760, doi:10.1038/nature05236 (2006).
16 Vitale, I & Kroemer, G. Spontaneous DNA damage propels tumorigenicity. Cell Res 27, 720-721, doi:10.1038/cr.2017.43 (2017).
17 Vitale, I et al. DNA Damage in Stem Cells. Mol Cell 66, 306-319, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.006 (2017).
18 Phillips, T M, McBride, W H & Pajonk, F. The response of CD24(-/low)/CD44+ breast cancer-initiating cells to radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst 98, 1777-1785, doi:10.1093/jnci/djj495 (2006)
19 Fukunaga, R et al. Dicer Partner Proteins Tune the Length of Mature miRNAs in Flies and Mammals. Cell 151, 912, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.029 (2012)
20 Goodarzi, H et al. Metastasis-suppressor transcript destabilization through TARBP2 binding of mRNA hairpins. Nature 513, 256-260, doi:10.1038/nature13466 (2014)
21 De Vito, C et al. A TARBP2-dependent miRNA expression profile underlies cancer stem cell properties and provides candidate therapeutic reagents in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Cell 21, 807-821, doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.023 (2012)
22 Cenik, ES et al. Phosphate and R2D2 restrict the substrate specificity of Dicer-2, an ATP-driven ribonuclease. Mol Cell 42, 172-184, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.002 (2011)
23 Marques, JT et al. Loqs and R2D2 act sequentially in the siRNA pathway in Drosophila. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17, 24-30, doi:10.1038/nsmb.1735 (2010)
24 Bennett, RL et al. RAX is required for fly neuronal development and mouse embryogenesis. Mech Dev 125, 777-785, doi:10.1016/j.mod.2008.06.009 (2008)
25 Menon, DU & Meller, VH. A role for siRNA in X-chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 191, 1023-1028, doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140236 (2012)
26 Saito, K, Ishizuka, A, Siomi, H & Siomi, MC. Processing of pre-microRNAs by the Dicer-1-Loquacious complex in Drosophila cells. PLoS Biol 3, e235, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030235 (2005).
27 Cipressa, F, Di Giorgio, M L & Cenci, G. A simple approach for multicolor immunofluorescence staining in different Drosophila cell types. J Cell Physiol 229, 683-687, doi:10.1002/jcp.24506 (2014)

Codice Bando: 
1961346

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma