Ricerc@Sapienza

Purpose: Today limited studies regarding surgical and hearing outcomes in patients undergoing the totally endoscopic ossicular chain reconstruction has been published. The aim of this study is to show the different materials and endoscopic technique used in our experience to perform a second stage endoscopic ossiculoplasty. Materials and methods: Patients underwent to second stage endoscopic ossiculoplasty has been enrolled in the study.

Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of the present study was to show our preliminary results regarding the endoscopic ear surgery application in malleostapedotomy surgery. Study Design: Case series. Methods: Six patients (four females and two males) who underwent endoscopic ear surgery as revision surgery for otosclerosis were enrolled in this study. For endoscopic malleostapedotomy surgery, rigid angled endoscopes at 0 ° and 30 ° with a length of 14 cm and an outer diameter of 3 and 4 mm were used.

Purpose Compare the outcomes of primary exclusive endoscopic ear surgery with those of the microscopic ear surgery in a group of patients affected by attic cholesteatoma. Materials and methods Eighty patients suffered from attic cholesteatoma. Forty patients surgical treated with endoscopic ear surgery and forty patients surgical treated with microscopic ear surgery.

In this previous study, we compared exclusive endoscopic ear surgery (EES) withmicroscopic earsurgery (MES) in the surgical treatment of a series of‘attic’cholesteatomas.Clarifications in response to some observations made by Zhengcai-Lou et al. are reported below. In the study conclusions, the authors did not indicate the EES as theoptimal treatment in cases of‘attic’ cholesteatoma.