Ricerc@Sapienza

Despite the introduction of evidence-based recommendations for postoperative pain management (POPM), the consensus is that pain control remains suboptimal. Barriers to achieving patient-satisfactory analgesia include deficient knowledge regarding POPM among staff, lack of instructions, insufficient pain assessments and sub-optimal treatment. Effective monitoring of POPM is essential to enable policy makers and healthcare providers to improve the quality of care.

A year in review focused on the last published papers on general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, office-based anesthesia, anesthesia in robotic surgery, muscle relaxants, airway management, perioperative medicine, postoperative analgesia, and pain

In clinical practice, analgesia is still empirically monitored by using variation of heart rate, blood pressure, and sweating, as the result of the sympathetic activation, or movements. The challenge of monitoring analgesia in anesthetized patients is related to the interference of hypnosis and cardiovascular drugs used during general anesthesia, and to the rapid changes of the sympathetic system activation observed during surgery.

Innovations in anesthesia and perioperative pain management have animated the debate the last year.

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) is a common complication in long-term opioid users and abusers. It is a burdensome condition, which significantly limits quality of life and is associated with increasing health costs. OIBD affects up to 60% of patients with chronic non-cancer pain and over 80% of patients suffering from cancer pain and is one of the conditions of the most common symptoms associated with opioid main-tenance. Given the continued use of opioids for chronic pain management in appropriate patients, OIBD is likely to persist in clinical practice in the coming years.

Introduction: Fixed-dose combination analgesic regimens may be similarly effective to opioid monotherapy but with potentially less risk. A number of individualized combination regimens can be created, including nonopioid agents such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and adjunctive agents such as gabapentin, pregabalin, and muscle relaxants. Areas covered: When such combinations have a synergistic effect, analgesic benefits may be enhanced.

Objective This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of ibuprofen 400 mg given 30 minutes before or immediately after third molars surgery under local anaesthesia. Materials and Methods The single‐center, randomized, split‐mouth, triple‐blind, clinical trial involved 38 outpatients, for a total of 76 bilateral symmetrical fully bone impacted mandibular third molars. Each patient was undergone to separate surgical sessions for the right and left side, and ibuprofen was randomly administered 30 minutes before or immediately after the intervention.

Pain, particularly chronic pain, is still an unsolved medical condition. Central goals in pain control are to provide analgesia of adequate efficacy and to reduce complications associated with the currently available drugs. Opioids are the mainstay for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. However, opioid pain medications also cause detrimental side effects, thus highlighting the need of innovative and safer analgesics. Opioids mediate their actions via the activation of opioid receptors, with the mu-opioid receptor as the primary target for analgesia, but also for side effects.

Light-operated drugs constitute a major target in drug discovery, since they may provide spatiotemporal resolution for the treatment of complex diseases (i.e. chronic pain). JF-NP-26 is an inactive photocaged derivative of the metabotropic glutamate type 5 (mGlu(5)) receptor negative allosteric modulator raseglurant. Violet light illumination of JF-NP-26 induces a photochemical reaction prompting the active-drug's release, which effectively controls mGlu5 receptor activity both in ectopic expressing systems and in striatal primary neurons.

BACKGROUND: he aim of our research is to evaluate the efectiveness of the spinal anesthesia versus Local Anesthesia within the context of Day Surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: his study is a clinical trial. 140 patients were enrolled (60 female, 80 male). Some parameters have been evaluated with scales ASA, Bromage Scale, Hollmen Scale, Numerical Rate Scale, and Patient Satisfaction that are now internationally recognized as valid to assess both the degree of anesthesia and the patient beneit. RESULTS: Data is mostly matching between the two groups, even though there are some diferences.