continuity of family status

The European Court of Human Rights and Technological Development. The Issue of the Continuity of the Family Status Established Abroad Through Recourse to Surrogate Motherhood

Surrogate motherhood is one of today’s controversial issues. It is debatable whether or not surrogacy is consistent with human rights. Consequently, State reactions to surrogacy range widely. People from countries where surrogacy is banned or strictly regulated have been increasingly resorting to surrogate motherhood abroad. Hence the question about the continuity of the family status created abroad through surrogacy. Also the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has dealt with that problem, mainly in the Mennesson, Labassee, and Paradiso et Campanelli cases.

The European Court of Human Rights Shaping Family Life in Cross-border Surrogacy. The Paradiso et Campanelli Case

Cross-border surrogacy has become increasingly common: people from countries where surrogacy is forbidden make recourse to it abroad. Yet, the home country’s ban on surrogacy may prevent the continuity of the family status established abroad. Such cases have been brought also before the European Court of Human Rights for the alleged violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The judgment that the Grand Chamber issued in the Paradiso et Campanelli c.

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma