Comparison of aortoiliac repair with iliac branch endoprosthesis versus hypogastric occlusion in aortoiliac aneurysms

01 Pubblicazione su rivista
Verzini Fabio, Cieri Enrico, Parlani Gianbattista, Pula Grazia, Simonte Gioele, De Blasis Giovanni, Di Girolamo Carla, Veroux Pierfrancesco, Giaquinta Alessia, Pratesi Carlo, Fargion Aaron T., Silingardi Roberto, Farchioni Luca, Jannello Antonio, Garri-Boli Luca, Fadda Gianfranco, Marino Mario, Cieri Enrico, Simonte Gioele, Parlani Giambattista, Speziale Francesco, Mansour Wassim, Giudice Rocco, Sbenaglia Giorgio, Ippoliti Arnaldo, Barbante Matteo, Gaggiano Andrea, Ferri Michelangelo, Rispoli Pietro, Verzini Fabio, Varetto Gian F., Ruffino Antonella, Veraldi Gianfranco, Mezzetto Luca
ISSN: 1824-4777

BACKGROUND: The CARIBE Study aims to assess the outcome of endovascular repair (EVAR) with iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) in patients with aorto-iliac aneurysms extending to iliac bifurcation, comparing these results with those of EVAR with hypogastric occlusion pres¬ ent in the recent published literature. METHODS: Patients with aorto-iliac aneurysms anatomically suitable for EVAR with IBE, are included in the study. RESULTS: Primary safety outcome measure are total and aneurysm related death free survival. Efficacy endpoints include: iliac branch patency, aneurysmal sac exclusion and freedom from reinterventions or conversion to open repair. Patient reported outcomes are evaluated with Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and quality of life Euro-Qual EQ-5D Questionnaire. CONCLuSIONS: Comparison with recent hystorical literature obtained in patients with EVAR with HA occlusion will offer data useful for correct information of patients affected by aorto-iliac aneurysms.

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma