Methodological Comparison of Different Projects

02 Pubblicazione su volume
Salvatori Livia Maria, Marceca Maurizio, Paglione Lorenzo, Angelozzi Aurora, Caminada Susanna, Errigo Miriam, Tofani Marco, Battisti Alessandra, Barnocchi Asia, Bodini Chiara, Riccio Martina, Maralla Rita, Gentilini Valeria, Cacciatore Francesca, Trusiani Elio, D’Onofrio Rosalba, Grifoni Roberta Cocci, Pierantozzi Mariano, Petrucci Enrica, Odoguardi Ilaria, Marchesani Graziano Enzo, Sgrò Corrado, Camaioni Chiara, Sangiorgi Daniela, Lucchi Fabio, Carrera Marta, Paoletti Flavio, Greco Alessandro Dario, Iorio Silvia
ISSN: 1865-3529

In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma