Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Treated by Endoluminal Loco-Regional Resection by Tem Vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: Long Term Results

04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno
D'Ambrosio Giancarlo, Picchetto Andrea, Campo Salvatore, Palma Rossella, Agostini M., Paganini ALESSANDRO MARIA, Lezoche E.
ISSN: 0930-2794

Background:
Endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic
microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total
mesorectal excision (LTME), in selected patients with N0 rectal cancer. Post-operative
Quality of Life (QoL) evaluation is an important parameter of outcomes related to high
percentage of functional sequelae. We reported, in a previous published paper, the short and
medium term results of QoL in patients underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME.
Aim:
The aim is to evaluate the 3y QoL in patients with iT2-T3 N0/
+
rectal cancer
underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (n-RCT) in a
retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
Materials and Methods:
We enrolled in this study 39 patients with iT2–iT3 rectal cancer
who underwent ELRR by TEM (n=19) or LTME (n=20), according to predefined criteria.
QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at admission,
after n-RCT and 1, 6, 12 and 36 months after surgery.
Results:
No statistically significant differences in QoL evaluation were observed between
the two groups, both at admission and after n-RCT.
In short term (1–6 months) period, significantly better results were observed in ELRR group
by QLQ-C30 in: Global Health Status (p=0.003), Physical Functioning (p=0.004), Role
Functioning (p=0.004), Emotional Functioning (p=0.004), Cognitive Functioning, Fatigue
(p=0.005), Dyspnoea (p=0.005), Insomnia (p=0.05), Appetite loss (p=0.05), Constipation
(p=0.05); and by QLQ-CR38 in: Body Image (p=0.03) and Defecation (p=0.025).
At 1 year, the two groups were homogenous as assessed by QLQ-C30, whereas the
QLQCR38 still showed better results of ELRR vs. LTME in Body Image (p=0.006),
Defecation Problems (p=0.01), and Weight Loss (p=0.005).
At 3 years no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups.
Conclusions:
In selected patient with rectal cancer, underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME,
QoL testes at 3 years don’t show any statistical difference on examined items.

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma