Ricerc@Sapienza

Although a new landscape of social finance institutions (SFIs) is evolving rapidly in Europe, the academic
literature on the structures of legitimation that characterize the development of social finance has been
limited. This paper addresses this gap: (1) by conceptualizing social finance (SF) as a pre-paradigmatic
field where leading SF institutions have spontaneously adopted different investment rationalities and
logics to achieve positive social impact through financing and banking activities; (2) by discussing
dominant institutionalization patterns, empirically exploring the institutionalization of SF at the organizational,
inter-organizational and institutional levels. A sample of seventeen SF institutions in three
European countries, i.e. Ireland, Italy and the UK, was examined. The analysis highlighted that two forms
of SF, i.e. social impact investment and ethical banking, guide the institutionalization and paradigmbuilding
process. These two forms both assume the production of social impact, i.e. impact on society,
the environment and sustainable development, as a distinguishing trait from commercial financial approaches,
but differ in terms of business models and products and services provided to customers.
Dominant institutionalization patterns reflect the social-embeddedness of these institutions. The
convergence of the two dominant models would be desirable in order to further facilitate the development
of social finance as a new paradigm in the financing and banking industry, alternative to
commercial finance.