Civil and Structural Engineering

Coupling damage and plasticity for a phase-field regularisation of brittle, cohesive and ductile fracture: One-dimensional examples

Plasticity and damage are two fundamental phenomena in nonlinear solid mechanics associated with the development of inelastic deformations and the reduction of the material stiffness. Alessi et al. [5] have recently shown, through a variational framework, that coupling a gradient-damage model with plasticity can lead to macroscopic behaviours assimilable to ductile and cohesive fracture. Here, we further expand this approach considering specific constitutive functions frequently used in phase-field models of brittle fracture.

Comparison of phase-field models of fracture coupled with plasticity

In the last few years, several authors have proposed different phase-field models aimed at describing ductile fracture phenomena. Most of these models fall within the class of variational approaches to fracture proposed by Francfort and Marigo [13]. For the case of brittle materials, the key concept due to Griffith consists in viewing crack growth as the result of a competition between bulk elastic energy and surface energy. For ductile materials, however, an additional contribution to the energy dissipation is present, related to plastic deformations.

Bistability of orthotropic shells with clamped boundary conditions: An analysis by the polar method

Multistable shells have been recently proposed as an effective solution to design morphing structures. We describe a class of shallow shells which are bistable after one of their sides, initially curved, is clamped along a flat line. Supposing the shell being assembled as a composite laminate, we show how the anisotropy of the material can influence the multistable behaviour and the robustness of stable configurations. Specifically, we focus on orthotropic laminated shells using the polar method for a complete representation of the anisotropic elastic properties.

Seismic Demand on Historical Constructions During the 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake Sequence

Between August 2016 and January 2017 nine shallow events with moment magnitude between 5.0 and 6.5 occurred in Central Italy, with largest magnitude being the most severe in Italy since 1980. Several thousands of heritage buildings have been affected to a different degree by the ground motion shaking, highlighting some specific behaviours in the most stricken areas. In and around Amatrice extensive masonry fragmentation, cracking of large walls without openings, as well as survival of tall towers and slender bell gables have been observed.

Seismic demand of the 2016–2017 Central Italy earthquakes

The seismic sequence which started on August 24th, 2016, caused hundreds of casualties, damage and collapses in four regions of Central Italy (Lazio, Umbria, Abruzzo and Marche). The strongest event, which occurred on October 30th (Mw6.5), was forerun by four earthquakes with magnitude between 5.4 and 6.0. So far, a total of nine events with magnitude greater than or equal to 5.0 have taken place in the affected area. The earthquakes were caused by normal faults, all of them having NW–SE or NNW–SSE strike, approximately along the spine of the Apennine Mountains.

Seismic behaviour of ordinary masonry buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquakes

Between August 2016 and January 2017 nine shallow earthquakes ranging from 5.0 and 6.5 of moment magnitude affected Central Italy, involving several municipalities wherein unreinforced masonry buildings are more than three quarters of all constructions. Damage state has been very severe, with sixteen settlements belonging to the municipalities of Amatrice, Arquata del Tronto, Accumoli, Castelsantangelo sul Nera and Norcia experiencing a cumulative European macroseismic scale intensity larger than IX.

Simplified survey form of unreinforced masonry buildings calibrated on data from the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake

The 2009 L’Aquila earthquake in southern Italy affected a rather large number of buildings, which experienced macroseismic intensities between V and IX on the Mercalli–Cancani–Sieberg scale. Almost sixty thousand unreinforced masonry constructions were officially inspected and almost half of them ended up losing their usability status temporarily, partially or completely, where the term usability refers to the suitability of a building for habitation or occupancy after a seismic event.

Seismic response prediction of reinforced concrete buildings through nonlinear combinations of intensity measures

A widespread approach for the prediction of the structural response as function of the ground motion intensity is based on the Cloud Analysis: once a set of points representing the engineering demand parameter (EDP) values is obtained as function of the selected seismic intensity measure (IM) for a collection of unscaled earthquake records, a regression analysis is performed by assuming a specific functional form to correlate these variables.

Seismic resilience of plywood-coupled LVL wall panels

Structural wall panels Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) have been proposed for enhanced seismic resistance of multi-storey timber buildings based on research performed at University of Canterbury, New Zealand. The system is designed to be self-centering with unbonded post-tensioning and dissipate energy through ductile connections. This paper describes the experimental and numerical investigation of one such arrangement with post-tensioned LVL wall panels coupled with plywood sheets.

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma