Ricerc@Sapienza

It is a fact that the varied philosophical movement that goes under the name of “phenomenology” has broadly accepted in its own field of inquiry a whole family of issues, all converging on a virtual blaze that can be defined, by first approximation, with the generic and all-encompassing noun “religion”. The paradigmatic example of an “ontological-regional” approach is Max Scheler's phenomenology of religion.

Dans ce qu’on pourrait considérer comme sa première confrontation articulée avec l’histoire de la pensée, le cours du 1923-1924 consacré à la Erste Philosophie, Husserl présente la phénoménologie comme le résultat du long processus de recherche du fondement propre à la philosophie. Dans cette évolution, « ontogenèse » et « phylogenèse » phénoménologiques semblent procéder en parallèle : la réduction eidétique et la réduction transcendantale sont associées aux deux figures que Husserl décrit comme fondamentales, à savoir Platon et Descartes.

Un omaggio a Francesco Saverio Trincia in conclusione dell'attività didattica presso il Dipartimento di Filosofia dell'Università Sapienza di Roma: il volume restituisce la personalità dello studioso che ha dedicato anni allo studio dell'etica, della fenomenologia, della psicoanalisi e delle trasformazioni della soggettività moderna.

Muovendo da alcune 'opere di Francesco Saverio Trincia, il contributo esamina il rapporto tra fenomenologia e psicoanalisi alla luce della nozione di "tautologia".

In the natural attitude, and in the ordinary language, religion is strictly bound to transcendence.
In this paper I ask whether the concept of “transcendence” is legitimate in the phenomenological
dimension, which is opened by the methodological operation of reduction
to the immanence of transcendental consciousness. By examining how “transcendence”
gains increasingly importance in Husserl’s thought, the necessity emerges to distinguish
three levels of it: intentional (or horizontal) transcendence, intersubjective transcendence

What is “Phenomenology of Religion”? This article maintains that it is not a discipline but the formulation of an essential link between phenomenology and philosophy of religion, between phenomenological epochē and the epoch of philosophy of religion. In particular, it will be shown that Levinas’ appropria-tion of the Heideggerian idea of ontotheology allows to pinpoint in the §58 of Husserl’s Ideas the moment in which God comes into phenomenology.